![]() This means the probability of the exercise being positive depends on how likely you are to be able to use the conversations as a productive starting point. I am concerned, however about the effect of someone setting up Amazon smile on the total amount that they donate in future, which I think will be negative if you ignore any potential introduction to EA. I'm uncertain about how large the effects in each case will be, but don't think they will be negative. My hope is that this positive experience will make people more likely to consider where their donations go in future, and/or to respond positively to future things they hear about EA. If they haven't heard of it before, it's likely that their net experience of hearing about it and setting it up will be positive (they are getting to donate to a charity with no downside, again rather like a giving game). Amazon Smile is a specific donation that you can ask people to consider how they make.(Giving games are another example of this) Asking people to carefully consider how they make a specific donation is a gentle way in, at least to 'soft EA'.Full EA can be quite a lot to try to introduce to people all at once, even when those people already want to help.To try to be sightly more clear about why I do think the mention is a useful starting point: I think this is a valid concern, and certainly don't think presenting 'Amazon smile is the sort of thing EAs do' is particularly useful or accurate. Read more about their effectiveness here: Read more about their effectiveness here: Animal Equality. My top picks are below: Against Malaria Foundation. Depending on which charity you choose to give to, the amount of good you end up doing could be surprisingly large. If you do, you may as well use and do some good at the same time. I'm not saying use Amazon, but over Black Friday, Christmas, and being too lazy to go outside, you're probably going to. It was written for my particular social media bubble, yours may be different, but at the very least it may save you some time. If you think I might be right, but don't want to waste time writing your own long-shot post to share on social media, feel free to use mine. It depends how likely you think I am to be right about this being a good way of starting conversations about charitable effectiveness. It seems somewhat more likely for non-EAs, though given that charitable effectiveness can vary by several orders of magnitude, if non-EAs are persuaded by you to send their smile donations to an effective charity this may not be enough to make the overall effect negative.Įven if the effect is positive, surely it's too small to be worth doing anything about? This seems somewhat unlikely for EAs, although not impossible. Signing up for smile may cause people to feel like they've "done their bit", and reduce donations elsewhere. This is, of course, less of a problem if you wouldn't have donated the extra money you are incentivised to waste on Amazon. If amazon smile causes you to spend more than you otherwise would have, especially on things you don't need, you could do much more good by donating directly instead of spending on Amazon. A social media post, with, for example, why you've chosen AMF for your smile donation, and why you think it's important to choose carefully rather than go with one of the defaults, is a gentle way in to thinking about idea of charitable effectiveness, and anecdotally has led to positive conversations with people I think a harder sell would have put off. This is free money, not very much, but for most people who use amazon, enough to be worth the ~30s it takes to set up.Īmazon smile lets you start conversations about charitable effectiveness with people who otherwise wouldn't go anywehere near EA topics. ![]() The AMF and Animal Equality (givewell and ACE top charities respectively). Using means that amazon will donate 0.5% of your purchases to a charity of your choice. While the content discussed below is relatively low impact compared to many of the ideas discussed on this forum, it requires so little time/money that the impact per cost still looks encouraging. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |